The conventional way of getting a degree is going to school for a certain number of years after which the degree is awarded on completion of the units of study required. Life experience degrees however disqualify this, as it is not necessary for one to attend classes and sit exams for a number of years to be in possession of such a degree. In order to get one, all that is needed is enough years of experience in the relevant field.
Is such a degree equal in value to one gotten through endless number of classes and exams? This is a question whose answer is relative. For some it is a big yes and for others a big no. Proponents of this concept as well as the opponents back up their stand with reasonable arguments.
Most bachelor degree programs take four years. This simply means that anyone who has four years of work involvement as a human resource manager for example, holds a bachelors degree in human resource management. For one who has six years of know how in the said field, he or she is equivalent with a masters degree holder from a university. For those with eight years of know-how, they qualify to be awarded doctorate degrees in the said field. This is how the concept works.
Critics of this kind of degree awards are quick to point out that their criticism should not be taken to be an implication that know how is not important. They accept that experience is as important as the academic qualification. They do not accept however, that the know how in itself can be regarded as an academic qualification.
One of the reasons why they oppose this concept is that the work environment is full of repetitive practices. The same person will do the same thing in the same way every day. After doing this for four years, the person is given a degree and considers him or herself as qualified as that person who went to school for the four years and was taught a wide variety of issues relating to the job.
Again, they argue that there are some general education core courses that one has to learn when getting a degree the conventional way. It is nearly impossible for a single individual to be experienced in all the fields covered by these general courses. Some of these courses include communications, world history, algebra and many more.
Supporters of this concept are not quiet either. For them, people go to school for the four years so that they can learn the tricks of the trade for the job in question. Having four years experience therefore means that one has adequately learnt the tricks of the trade and this is why they were able to keep the job for four years.
Life experience degrees are here to stay. Whether on the supporting side or the opposing, they are going nowhere. This is evidenced by the growing number of institutions offering them.
Is such a degree equal in value to one gotten through endless number of classes and exams? This is a question whose answer is relative. For some it is a big yes and for others a big no. Proponents of this concept as well as the opponents back up their stand with reasonable arguments.
Most bachelor degree programs take four years. This simply means that anyone who has four years of work involvement as a human resource manager for example, holds a bachelors degree in human resource management. For one who has six years of know how in the said field, he or she is equivalent with a masters degree holder from a university. For those with eight years of know-how, they qualify to be awarded doctorate degrees in the said field. This is how the concept works.
Critics of this kind of degree awards are quick to point out that their criticism should not be taken to be an implication that know how is not important. They accept that experience is as important as the academic qualification. They do not accept however, that the know how in itself can be regarded as an academic qualification.
One of the reasons why they oppose this concept is that the work environment is full of repetitive practices. The same person will do the same thing in the same way every day. After doing this for four years, the person is given a degree and considers him or herself as qualified as that person who went to school for the four years and was taught a wide variety of issues relating to the job.
Again, they argue that there are some general education core courses that one has to learn when getting a degree the conventional way. It is nearly impossible for a single individual to be experienced in all the fields covered by these general courses. Some of these courses include communications, world history, algebra and many more.
Supporters of this concept are not quiet either. For them, people go to school for the four years so that they can learn the tricks of the trade for the job in question. Having four years experience therefore means that one has adequately learnt the tricks of the trade and this is why they were able to keep the job for four years.
Life experience degrees are here to stay. Whether on the supporting side or the opposing, they are going nowhere. This is evidenced by the growing number of institutions offering them.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.survivinglifeuniversity.com for more helpful information about Important Information About Life Experience Degrees
0 comments:
Post a Comment